I think about
food a lot, probably because I seem to be perpetually hungry (the
result, no doubt, of the increasing need to limit my caloric intake,
since the older I get the less efficiently my body is able to burn
those calories).
Recently, my
food thoughts turned to the question, what exactly is the “official”
difference between a vegetable and a fruit? You know the problem: A
bell pepper is the fruiting part of the plant, is brightly colored,
has seeds, and looks like a fruit. So why is it referred to as a
vegetable?
this one clearly has
“fruiting” parts
A search on the web reveals numerous
articles on the subject of “fruit vs. vegetable.” (See, e.g., here.) Certain plant foods are easy to classify: The non-seed-bearing
parts—e.g., the leaves, stem, root—are almost (but see below)
always vegetables, both in the botanical and culinary worlds.
definitely vegetables
The confusion arises with regard to the
seed-bearing parts of plants. For instance, the flowers, if eaten
before they produce seeds, are classified as vegetables. Thus,
cauliflower and broccoli are vegetables, even though they would go to
seed if left uncut.
cauli and romanesco
There are, in fact, two different
definitions for “fruit”: the scientific one, and the culinary
one. In botany, a fruit is simply the seed-bearing part of any plant.
Thus, green beans are fruit in scientific terms.
In culinary terms, however, a botanical
fruit is only a “fruit” if it is sweet. Harold McGee offers up this definition of culinary fruits in his wonderful
treatise, On Food and Cooking:
Culinary fruits are
distinguished from vegetables by one important characteristic:
they’re among the few things we eat that we’re meant to eat. Many
plants have engineered their fruits to appeal to the animal senses,
so that animals will eat them and disperse the seeds within. These
fruits are the natural world’s soft drinks and candies, flashily
packaged in bright colors, and test-marketed through millions of
years of natural selection.
natural
selection meets human tinkering in a fruit
[Culinary fruits]
tend to have a higher sugar content, to satisfy the innate liking for
sweetness shared by all animals. They have a pronounced and complex
aroma, which may involve several hundred different chemicals, far
more than any other natural ingredient. [Ed. note: the genome of the
pinot noir grape was sequenced a few years back, revealing
that it has more genes in its DNA than the human genome.]
not
pinot noir, but still complex
And they soften
themselves to an appealingly tender, moist consistency. By contrast,
the plant foods that we treat as vegetables remain firm, have either
a very mild flavor—green beans and potatoes—or else an
excessively strong one—onions and cabbage—and therefore require
the craft of the cook to make them palatable.
sweet and soft mangoes
Sounds simple, non? But
wait—there’s a hitch. Turns out that there are some seed-bearing
parts of plants that are not sweet, but which are nevertheless
often classified as fruits in the culinary world. The avocado, for
example, is considered a fruit by many cooks. (See, e.g. here.) Perhaps this is because it is sometimes used in desserts, such as avocado pie.
the first avocado from my
tree
And that’s not all. There are
non-seed-bearing plant parts that are considered fruits by
many cooks, such as rhubarb (see, e.g., here.) This is no doubt because, although it isn’t sweet, rhubarb is
used as a fruit in making desserts.
And then sometimes it takes the U.S.
Supreme Court to decide whether the plant part is a fruit or
vegetable. (Yep, I’m an ex-lawyer, as is my protagonist, Sally
Solari.) In Nix v. Hedden (1893), the court observed that tomatoes are “usually served at a
dinner in, with, or after the soup, fish, or meat, which constitute
the principal part of the repast, and not, like fruits, generally as
dessert.” Thus, the court determined, the tomato was a vegetable,
and subject to the Tariff Act.
So, how do you
cooks and non-cooks out there define fruits and vegetables? Do share
any amusing stories you might have on this conundrum!
sometimes fruits and veg go well together, too!
That's funny, because I have always heard that tomatoes are actually fruit, despite my own associations to them as vegetables. I'm actually happy to hear that much of this is ambiguous.
ReplyDelete